Hyperbolic spaces have been quite popular in the recent past for representing hierarchically organized data. Further, several classification algorithms for data in these spaces have been proposed in the literature. These algorithms mainly use either hyperplanes or geodesics for decision boundaries in a large margin classifiers setting leading to a non-convex optimization problem. In this paper, we propose a novel large margin classifier based on horospherical decision boundaries that leads to a geodesically convex optimization problem that can be optimized using any Riemannian gradient descent technique guaranteeing a globally optimal solution.

Hyperbolic spaces have been quite popular in the recent past for representing hierarchically organized data. Further, several classification algorithms for data in these spaces have been proposed in the literature. These algorithms mainly use either hyperplanes or geodesics for decision boundaries in a large margin classifiers setting leading to a non-convex optimization problem. In this paper, we propose a novel large margin classifier based on horospherical decision boundaries that leads to a geodesically convex optimization problem that can be optimized using any Riemannian gradient descent technique guaranteeing a globally optimal solution.

Persistent homology is an effective method for extracting topological information, represented as persistent diagrams, of spatial structure data. Hence it is well-suited for the study of protein structures. Attempts to incorporate Persistent homology in machine learning methods of protein function prediction have resulted in several techniques for vectorizing persistent diagrams. However, current vectorization methods are excessively artificial and cannot ensure the effective utilization of information or the rationality of the methods. To address this problem, we propose a more geometrical vectorization method of persistent diagrams based on maximal margin classification for Banach space, and additionaly propose a framework that utilizes topological data analysis to identify proteins with specific functions. We evaluated our vectorization method using a binary classification task on proteins and compared it with the statistical methods that exhibit the best performance among thirteen commonly used vectorization methods. The experimental results indicate that our approach surpasses the statistical methods in both robustness and precision.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate infinity-sample properties of risk minimization based multi-category classification methods. These methods can be considered as natural extensions to binary large margin classification. We establish conditions that guarantee the infinity-sample consistency of classifiers obtained in the risk minimization framework. Examples are provided for two specific forms of the general formulation, which extend a number of known methods. Using these examples, we show that some risk minimization formulations can also be used to ob- tain conditional probability estimates for the underlying problem.

We will also introduce a regularization strategy (analogous to weight decay) into boosting. This strategy uses slack variables to achieve a soft margin (section 4). Numerical experiments show the validity of our regularization approach in section 5 and finally a brief conclusion is given. 2 AdaBoost Algorithm Let {ht(x): t 1,...,T} be an ensemble of T hypotheses defined on input vector x and e

We will also introduce a regularization strategy (analogous to weight decay) into boosting. This strategy uses slack variables to achieve a soft margin (section 4). Numerical experiments show the validity of our regularization approach in section 5 and finally a brief conclusion is given. 2 AdaBoost Algorithm Let {ht(x): t 1,...,T} be an ensemble of T hypotheses defined on input vector x and e

We will also introduce a regularization strategy(analogous to weight decay) into boosting. This strategy uses slack variables to achieve a soft margin (section 4). Numerical experiments show the validity of our regularization approach in section 5 and finally a brief conclusion is given. 2 AdaBoost Algorithm Let {ht(x): t 1, ...,T} be an ensemble of T hypotheses defined on input vector x and e